Will a Nuclear Weapon Be Used in Conflict by 2030?
Outcome
% Chance
Outcome
%Chance
Will a Nuclear Weapon Be Used in Conflict by 2030?
Will a Nuclear Weapon Be Used in Conflict by 2030?
Will a Nuclear Weapon Be Used in Conflict by 2030?
By placing order, you agree to Terms & Conditions
Resolution Criteria
This market resolves to Yes if, on or before December 31, 2030, a nuclear weapon is detonated in conflict by a nation-state or non-state actor as an act of war, attack, or terrorism.
To resolve Yes, all of the following must be true:
- A nuclear weapon (fission or fusion-based explosive device) is intentionally detonated against a military or civilian target, not as a test, accident, or threat.
- The detonation is in the context of hostile conflict, defined as:
- An act of war (e.g., nuclear strike or battlefield use), or
- A terrorist or insurgent attack involving a nuclear explosive device.
- The event is publicly confirmed by at least two credible sources, such as:
- Government or military statements (e.g., Pentagon, UN Security Council, IAEA).
- Major international media outlets (e.g., Reuters, BBC, Associated Press).
- International monitoring organizations (e.g., CTBTO, SIPRI) confirming the nuclear nature of the explosion.
Excluded scenarios:
- Nuclear tests (e.g., underground or atmospheric trials not intended as conflict acts).
- Accidental detonations (e.g., unintentional launches or mishandlings).
- Failed launches or non-nuclear “dirty bombs” (radiological dispersal without a nuclear blast).
- Mere threats or announcements of intent to use nuclear weapons.
If no qualifying conflict-based nuclear detonation occurs by the end of 2030, the market resolves to No.
News
Alexey Vasiliev: A review conference on the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) was recently held at the UN headquarters in New York - Pravda EU
A recent UN-held NPT review conference ended in failure, with criticisms that the nonproliferation regime is unraveling as the US and allied powers push pressure and weaponization, France expands its arsenal, discussions arise about nuclear capabilities in several countries, and a proposed shift toward a multipolar world and a new international order to redefine who may possess nuclear weapons.
What India and Pakistan’s new arms race means for the region - CSMonitor.com
India and Pakistan are rapidly expanding a new, high-tech arms race—boosting drones, precision missiles, air defenses, and surveillance, increasing military budgets and deepening regional alignments after last year’s clash and a May 2025 ceasefire, with Islamabad courting China and Turkey and Delhi pursuing Rafale jets, S-400 systems, foreign collaborations, and domestic production, potentially enabling faster, less predictable warfare closer to civilian areas.
The Christian Science MonitorNew Zealand Should Have ‘Conversation’ on Nuclear Stance, Minister Says - Bloomberg
New Zealand Defence Minister Chris Penk says New Zealand should have a national conversation about its anti-nuclear stance in light of Australia’s move to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, suggesting the debate could distinguish nuclear propulsion from weapons.
Haslinda AminWhy does Trump want to transfer Cold War-era plutonium to nuclear start-ups? - France 24
The Trump administration has selected several nuclear start-ups, including Newcleo, to potentially access 99 tons of Cold War–era plutonium to be repurposed as fuel for small modular reactors, a move critics warn could raise proliferation risks, be costly and impractical, and may serve more as a PR boost for the startups than a sound US policy.
报告：台海冲突或引发美中核升级 卫星显示北京扩充核武库
A new IISS strategic assessment warns that a Taiwan-related US–China conflict could escalate to nuclear war, while satellite imagery indicates Beijing is massively expanding its nuclear arsenal and related infrastructure in Xinjiang and Gansu to ensure survivable second-strike capability, amid a rapid, unchecked buildup that outpaces other nuclear powers.
US warns it is capable of resuming war with Iran as deal remains elusive - CNA
The United States warned it is capable of resuming war with Iran as negotiations over a peace deal with Tehran remain unsettled, with Trump insisting any agreement must block Iran from developing nuclear weapons and reopen Hormuz, while Iran sought a dignified framework and negotiations continued alongside regional tensions involving Israel, Lebanon, and Hezbollah.
Iran’s nuclear stockpile - a key part of negotiations to end the war and a focus of Trump’s - explained
Iran’s near-half-ton stockpile of highly enriched uranium (about 60% purity, with ~970 pounds near weapons-grade and ~406 pounds at 20%) is a central sticking point in negotiations to end the war, as experts warn it could be weaponized in weeks, U.S. plans consider removing or reducing it (potentially via a military option), and its fate remains unsettled alongside broader ceasefire talks and reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
St. Petersburg vs. the Golden Dome: A 150‑Year‑Old Warning We Are Ignoring | Countercurrents
The article argues that the St. Petersburg Declaration 150 years ago established that some weapons are morally unacceptable regardless of military necessity, and warns today that US missile-defense plans and space militarization threaten to escalate arms races, create catastrophic risk from false alarms, and undermine global disarmament through renewed commitment to restraint, diplomacy, and humanitarian disarmament.
AI Dangers Eclipse Nuclear Weapons at Singapore Defense Forum - Bloomberg
AI risks overshadowed nuclear weapons at a Singapore defense forum, with experts warning AI could erode the OODA loop (observe, orient, decide, act), narrowing reaction times and prompting rash, irrational decisions.
Gerry DoyleTrump warned Iran to make deal or face military option, Hegseth says | Iran International
Trump reportedly told cabinet members that Iran could strike a “great deal” to prevent a nuclear weapon or face the military option, amid hard-line opposition in Iran to concessions and renewed US-Iran talks, with analysts noting hard-liners influence despite leadership support, and regional maritime security warnings near the Strait of Hormuz as US and UK forces monitor potential Iranian actions.